batz wrote:I sometimes see 2 dununs being played stacked horizontally by one person. I just assume its an adhoc setup useful when there is only one person playing dununs. But I wonder if this is even acceptable from the view of traditional rhythms and how they are supposed to be played? I only ever see Mamady Keita with either the three dununs played horizontally by 3 separate people or the 3 dununs played by one person in a vertical setup.
Further, most of the time I have trouble figuring out where does the pattern for this 2-horizontal-dunun setup come from? Is it just a combination of the dununba and sangban patterns pulled together with a single bell?
But a lot of times what I've seen played in this setup doesn't directly translate from the traditional dunun patterns I know.
I want to understand this because I will be in a situation soon where there will only be 1 dunun player available, and I want to know how to properly play in this 2-horizontal-dunun setup and where the patterns come from.
michi wrote:(By playing the dunduns upright instead, it's often possible to play a better approximation of the composite melody because the player has two hands available to play the skins.)
dleufer wrote:I generally find that any rhythms where the dununba rumbles/shuffles (e.g. o.oo.oo.oo.o) onbeat or offbeat don't translate very well (e.g. Soli, Soko, Dunungbe)
dleufer wrote:I'm a bit confused by the phrase "3 horizontal ballet dunun setup" because for me ballet means dunun upright/vertical with no bell.
bubudi wrote:batz, as a teacher i feel it's better to learn the traditional way first, ballet later - it gives you a better appreciation of the essence and melody of the rhythm. once you develop this appreciation you'll naturally find yourself doing your own arrangements of the rhythms you play.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Translate this page using Google