dununbabe wrote:what would be a good way to let it be known that the Mamady's "Certificate", and its higher "Diploma" exist? Do you think there should be a page about it on the website?
Virtually everything I know about the certificate has come to me by people here in this forum and by talking to other TTM teachers. There is essentially nothing about the program available from any public source, as far as I know (other than what has been posted here).
I think it really would help if TTM had a website or a bunch of pages about the certificate and the diploma that explain what they are about, what the aims are, what it takes to get certified, and some statements about the level of competency that is implied by having passed them.
Basically, if/once I pass my exam, I can put on my website that I'm a TTM teacher. But, without some information to back up what that means, stating that I'm a TTM teacher has little value. I think it would help TTM and the teachers to have a brand associated with the qualification. For example, there could be a separate logo for the certificate that teachers can put on their website, and have the logo link to pages at TTM that explain to prospective students that learning from a TTM teacher implies a high level of competence, skill, and accuracy. This would make it clear to prospective students that they have a reasonable assurance of not falling prey to some charlatan...
How are you coming along with studying

? Have you found a good group of students to work out rhythms with?
Working on it

Quite intensively actually. I have 9 of the 12 solos memorised and I can play them with the correct feel, I believe. There are some doubts about handing in a few places, which I'll try to sort out next time I see Mamady. I'm working gradually on the other 60 rhythms, a little bit at a time. I'm also studying with another person here in Australia who is working toward the certificate. We get together periodically to practice, help each other, and critically review each other's playing. This certainly helps, both in terms of getting things right, but also in terms of motivation (besides being a lot fun). And I teach what I study (once I have actually mastered it to the point where I can teach it in good conscience--my students are not guinea pigs...)
I don't want to rush the certificate though. I don't think the point is to cram everything just so I can pass the exam. Instead, I think the point is to have spent time with each rhythm and to have played it a lot. Once that process is complete, the exam is more or less a formality, I guess. In other words, to me, the goal isn't to pass the exam but to thoroughly know those 60 rhythms and to be able to improvise around the solo originals, maintaining the feel and concept of each of these solos.
I don't expect to sit the exam before at least two years have gone by...
re: "being ready", I think it has to do with a persons motivation. WHY are they teaching? to make money?
Not a good reason. Fundamentally the wrong motivation, not to mention the fact that it's well-nigh impossible to make money by teaching, other than as a sideline.
because they just love to play? they love the culture and want to share?
Much better reasons!

I believe that if a teacher teaches without true respect and love for the culture, it will come through in their teachings eventually and they will simply fade away.
One would hope so. My actual experience suggests otherwise. I know a number of teachers who I believe shouldn't be teaching because their motivation is wrong and their competence is lacking. Yet, these people are not showing any signs of stopping. And the students who come to them don't know that what they are learning is wrong, and that their technique is nothing like it should be. Every now and then, I end up with a student like this in my class, and they are dismayed when I gently break the news to them that they'll have to unlearn a fair bit of what they think they know...
For about two years before I started teaching, a number of people kept asking me to start my own classes. I kept pushing back because I did not want to fall into the trap of being yet another incompetent teacher who only thinks he knows what he teaches. I was also acutely aware of my limitations and need for more than just a stash of rhythms in a teacher. After all, this music is about so much more than just being able to play a given rhythm correctly.
Then, about six months before I actually started teaching, two of my African teachers independently said to me "Michi, you have to start teaching, it's the next step for you." This did not come as a request, but as an imperative from both of them. At that point, I felt that I at least could pass on what I know in good conscience, having been given the missive by my teachers.
I didn't start teaching until half a year later. What finally provided the impetus was that my main teacher here left for two months, with the possibility of staying away longer. (Fortunately, he's returned since...) I found myself without a teacher and didn't want to stagnate. So, at that point, I finally went "right, teaching is a good way to learn, and my teacher's hiatus is the sign that it's time to start something."
As it turned out, that was right on the money. Teaching forced me to pay attention to the rhythms I teach in much more depth, so I'm learning more. And the teaching itself teaches me a lot. What works and doesn't work, depending on the student, how to help students get over difficulties, etc. And, as I found out, I love doing it. It's the highlight of my week.
At the last Bundagen camp, Epizo spent a fair bit of time with Linda (my co-teacher) and myself telling us about teaching, about the motivation, and talking about the dangers of teaching. Epizo made it quite clear that teaching is dangerous (yes, that's the word he used). Basically, he warned us about teaching for the wrong reasons. Once you start teaching for the sake of teaching itself (to feed your ego), or you are teaching because you need the money, it's over. Epizo said that "You must have fun playing, and you must want to play for the fun of playing. The teaching then just comes from that. But watch out that the teaching keeps coming from a deep desire to play the music. If that desire goes away, you'll end up being both a bad teacher and a bad musician."
bubudi wrote:one of the criticisms of ttm i hear from people is that as far as testing goes, it is much about regurgitating set patterns and solos. i know the aim is deeper than that. certainly, these critics don't know much about the ttm diploma (if they've even heard of it).
Right. I think it would be good to get the message out a bit more. Having talked to Mamady about it, I know first hand that the certificate is definitely not about just regurgitating the items on a curriculum. In fact, listening to Mamady, I get the impression that being competent at playing these 60 rhythms is coincidental to the deeper goals, such as becoming an ambassador for Mandingue culture, furthering the cause of TTM, honouring the tradition, and "getting under the skin" of the music and dance. I think Mamady's goal is much greater than just providing a stamp of approval for a set skill level. But that message needs to get out, otherwise the certificiate has meaning only to handful of cognoscenti.
Mamady also spoke repeatedly about the diploma and what a deep commitment and achievement it represents. He obviously takes the diploma extremely seriously. With only four people currently having achieved it, it's definitely not something that can be done without a lot of dedication and personal sacrifice. Again, getting the message out about this would certainly be worthwhile.
Cheers,
Michi.