Mikeleza wrote:Afoba wrote:these instruments have never be the same.
people can invent things that are relatively close to each other in different places at about the same time (writing, boats, etc...). And - let's be honest - the idea to build a drum is much less spectecular than to construct a car.
...
When you go back in time, the name of the drum and the way it is made would surely change.
The evolution of the drum (not that I know much) as I imagine it, would have been much like the evolution of rhythms.
You start with a basic pulse... someone claps their hand in a constant motion and time and then someone adds a counter rhythm through voice or more clapping. Over time people add more rhythms to it and add different instruments. Just like with the dun ensemble.... traditionally songs would have existed with only one dun and gradually more duns were added. The result that we see today with rhythms like Bolokonondo are modern complex creations where the original basic pulse "seems to" have disappeared.
When I see the similarities between different peg drums from Angola, Ghana, Senegal and other countries, it tells me that these drums are closer to the root creation of the african drum. Though there are subtle difference in these peg drums, the basic principle is the same and a lot of the techniques look similar also. Technique depends a lot on the way an instrument is tuned and the shape of the edge of the drum. I'm pretty sure that the way djembe players play today has little relevance to the way they played before the use of rope and steel.
I'm not trying to discourage people learning technique or tradition... obviously A LOT OF ADVANCES have been made in the past thousand years and that culture is great to learn!
The idea is to allow ourselves to also open our minds to the possibilities of how we came to this modern day situation. ...
1) drums/rhythms/modern
Hi Mike, there is some truth in what you say concerning the development of rythms and the changed or changing situation during the last 50-55 years. Of course rhythms develop, they have not been given to Adam the eighth day. But I beg you to take care about how you call this changing and not to mix up different meanings of "modernity".
You say "rhythms like Bolokonondo are modern complex creations",
"the way djembe players play today has little relevance to the way they played before the use of rope and steel" and you talk about "this modern day situation".
Well what means "modern"? In Europe it is a term to describe everything that has appeared after the French Revolution. We then got the term "post modern", which is used for everything after 1945 in science. In our every day life we're used to say modern, when we talk about post modern (or "post post modern"?) phenomenons. It's difficult to use these terms for WA. Normally it had to be "modern" for the colonial times after 1789/1800 and post modern for the time after 1958/60 that's to say after independance. When I say "modern" (talking about the development of WA music) I refer to post modern phenomenons, such as ballets and their influences on traditional music. We have to keepthis separated: Bolokonondo might have appearde after 1800, but that doesn't make it a modern rhythm in the pure sense "Modern" stands as the opposite of "traditional" when we talk about music from WA - it's not just a time marker anymore!
The way the djembé is built today is (post) modern for sure. The way the djembé is played is very different from situation to situation. The most (post modern) player in the world will be Adama Dramé. Then everyone who has played in the ballets for some time is a kind of (post) modern player (even if he knows the traditions well - like e.g. Famoudou). Mansa Camio plays quite traditionally, but still he is a (post) modern djembé player in another sense, for he has lived in Bamako and Abidjan which has changed a bit the music in his home village when he came back.
We have to be very careful talking about the "modern situation" (I'm not as careful as I describe it here every minute, either), because this is a huge complex or even several complexes. What I want to say is, Bolokonondo can be much newer than other rhythms (we don't even know), having a look at the rhythm's length, but it is a traditional rhythm. And traditional rhythms can still appear today (and you couldn't call them modern, because this term is taken for the ballet culture and the newer kora stuff in Mali).
2) universality
It's always interesting to think about the development of things we see today. And of course, things might have developed from "easier" to more complex. But the idea of "universality", that some things are the same or where the same everywhere or in a huge area has often been tried by ethnologues and was nearly always wrong.
At the same time the same principe can be used by different groups (have a look at frame drums from Kenya and Ireland, who took it from whom?). The principe of pegs exists in Ghana, Togo and in Senegal (...?); this is quite interesting. But it only proves that it is a good system for many people, not that their drums have been the same before. The djembé has never had this kind of tuning (we know both that we can never prove our theories or ideas, so we are free to speculate d;-) ).
3) dunduns
You say probably the second (and sometimes third) dundun has appeared later. Might be, who would say before playing: "Listen, we need two or three of it"? But probably the djembé is the instrument that has joined last in a lot of regions. Most rhythms we play outside Africa are dundun rhythms, not djembé rhythms. Rainer Polak had this idea of seperating djembé rhythms from dundun rhythms. I still don't know, if it's a good idea, because it's quite hard to tell this today, and I don't know if he found a second rhythm after Soli/Suku that he would classify as djembé rhythm. But it's a nice approach - just as your questions: I don't think the question is "right", but still it can lead us to some interesting points - and that's all knowledge or science is about.
So my provocative thesis to end this post:
In every place where djembé and dunduns play together, the dundun (the less complex instrument to link it to your historical approach, Mike) has been first.
4) I forgot something important: There are the so called Kèuru drums in Upper Guinea that are probably older than djembé and dundun (my thoughts). There are different style: some look like not finished djembés others are tall (solo instrument) and have 3 or 4 legs. THEY ARE PLAYED WITH STICKS! And there are neither pegs nor ropes. Fakoli is still played on these drums. Everyone has to decide, if the contradicts my thesis from above. The counter thesis would be that the Kèuru are the origin of both, djembé and dundun, what would be much closer to your thoughts, Mike, I guess.
By the way: I think that blacksmiths weren't automatically the first who played djembé. Maybe they were the first who played (or only built?) the drums that were there before!
Blacksmiths in the beginning of djembé playing is no fact, just a nice idea, too, that has become a nice little history for djembé pupils.
Greetings, Daniel